E-mail contracts (finally) valid in Czech labour law?

Recently, a decision of the Supreme Court case no. 21 Cdo 2061/2021 caused a considerable stir among the professional public. In this decision the Supreme Court addressed a question of whether (some) contracts can be validly concluded remotely in employment relationships. In particular, it considered the situation where the documents were not delivered to the parties in accordance with the Labour Code; but only by a simple e-mail. Is the alarm caused legitimate?

In the case under review, the employee was dismissed for organizational reasons. The employee objected to the termination, but it remained in force (it was not revoked by the Employer). In the meantime, negotiations took place regarding severance pay to the employee’s satisfaction, which resulted in a ‘settlement agreement’ in which the employer agreed to pay severance pay by a certain date. The employer failed to do so, and the employee brought an action to recover the agreed amount. The main issue addressed by the Courts was whether the settlement agreement was validly executed and existed at all. The employer argued that the settlement agreement never came into existence because the agreement in question was not delivered to the employee in person or by alternative means in accordance with sections 334 to 336 of the Labour Code. 

Although it is not entirely clear from the Supreme Court’s judgment what the content of the settlement agreement was, it can be understood from the circumstances of the case that this legal action was taken in connection with the issue of termination of employment and was thus a document related to the creation, alteration or termination of the employment relationship. The Supreme Court stated that the Labour Code does not contain a complex legal regulation of assessment of the validity of such agreements and thus the Civil Code regulation shall apply.

According to the opinion expressed by the Supreme Court, the special regulation of delivery of documents in employment relationships does not precede the requirements for the execution of an agreement as set out by the Civil Code.

Even though the violation of the rules for the delivery of documents contained in the provisions of Sections 334 to 336 of the Labour Code results in the absence of such a legal act (contained in the document), it does not mean that the agreement could not arise (occur) in a different, legally foreseen way. The rules of the Civil Code thereby also apply to the procedure for concluding agreements within employment relationships.

The Supreme Court concluded that a scanned version of signed settlement agreement sent by the employer as an attachment to an e-mail, which the employee subsequently accepted in the same manner constitutes valid means of execution of the agreement. However, it is clear from the reasoning of the decision that the same approach should only apply to bi-(multi)-lateral legal actions in the context of employment relations.

By Konečná & Zacha law firm, Lithuania, a Transatlantic Law International Affiliated Firm.  

For further information or for any assistance please contact centraleurope@transatlanticlaw.com

Disclaimer: Transatlantic Law International Limited is a UK registered limited liability company providing international business and legal solutions through its own resources and the expertise of over 105 affiliated independent law firms in over 95 countries worldwide. This article is for background information only and provided in the context of the applicable law when published and does not constitute legal advice and cannot be relied on as such for any matter. Legal advice may be provided subject to the retention of Transatlantic Law International Limited’s services and its governing terms and conditions of service. Transatlantic Law International Limited, based at 42 Brook Street, London W1K 5DB, United Kingdom, is registered with Companies House, Reg Nr. 361484, with its registered address at 83 Cambridge Street, London SW1V 4PS, United Kingdom.